Business Cut Back Most
on Power Use in Blackout
Electricity Cut Backs
Evidence suggests that the province's
biggest industries, plus Toronto's big commercial customers,
accounted for more than 70 per cent of the conservation
efforts following the blackout that staggered northeastern
North America last August. Householders may have chipped
in less than 25 per cent of the conservation
effort.
Households account for more than 40 per
cent of the province's power use. In response, the agency
that oversees Ontario's electricity system has
been asked to find out what groups of customers did
the best job of conserving electricity during the eight-day
emergency following the Aug. 14 blackout.
Derek Cowbourne, vice-president of market
service for the Independent Electricity Market
Operator, or IMO, confirmed yesterday that he's been
asked to study conservation patterns during the power
emergency.
The request came from members of the IMO's
market advisory council, whose members are drawn from
a range of industry and consumer groups.
Cowbourne said in an interview he'll have
to ask local utilities for their data before he can
draw a complete picture of who used what during the
emergency. He hasn't yet sent out a request.
But current evidence indicates that big
businesses carried most of the conservation load.
The rough and ready numbers look something
like this:
The IMO said power use during the emergency
was down about 4,000 megawatts, peaking around 19,000
megawatts each day instead of 23,000 megawatts.
The Association of Major Power Consumers
of Ontario, or AMPCO, said its members, under pressure
from the provincial government, cut their consumption
in half during the emergency, many by simply shutting
down.
AMPCO members account for about 15 per
cent of total power use in the province; they saved
1,600 megawatts by cutting back.
Its members include the big auto assembly
plants, oil refineries, pulp mills and miners.
Tom Adams of Energy Probe noted that Toronto
Hydro credited its large commercial customers with cutting
back power use by 30 to 40 per cent.
Toronto Hydro said that measurements taken
in one residential neighbourhood showed that householders
cut back only about 20 per cent.
The cutbacks by the big Toronto users
– who overlap very little with AMPCO's members
– would trim about 5 per cent or 1,180 megawatts
from total consumption, Adams estimated.
The power saved by AMPCO and Toronto Hydro's
big customers counts for 2,780 megawatts, or nearly
70 per cent of the total power reduction in the province.
It's a near certainty that businesses outside Toronto
who are not AMPCO members also contributed to the conservation
effort, shrinking the share of conservation by householders
still further.
Don Thorne, chief executive of Milton
Hydro, said his utility's data indicate that householders
cut back their power use very little during the eight-day
emergency.
"It is very clear that there wasn't
a lot going on there," he said in an interview.
"People still ran their air conditioners
and so on. You start thinking: Why is that? The media
did an excellent job of telling people what they could
do (to conserve)."
Big industrial outfits seem to have been
most conscientious about cutting back, Thorne said,
noting that they were directly pressured to do so by
the province.
Municipalities also pitched in, Thorne
said, but probably could have reduced their consumption
more if better plans had been in place showing them
the most effective ways of cutting power use while maintaining
essential services.
Figuring out who cut consumption and who
didn't isn't a matter of finger-pointing, Adams said.
Both policy makers and the people designing
the electricity system need to understand who responds
to conservation appeals and who doesn't.
Adams said it could be dangerous to make
future emergency plans on the assumption that householders
will pitch in with conservation efforts if evidence
shows they don't. And if expensive new safeguards have
to be built in to prevent future collapses, or make
it easier to restore power when they occur, then it's
fair to ask who should pay for them.
John Spears
Energy Probe
|